CLEAN NEEDLES BENEFIT SOCIETY/PROGRAMS DON'T MAKE SENSE

Argument Evaluation Assignment name 1: CLEAN NEEDLES BENEFIT SOCIETY1. range at least two designs.

Argument 1:?The 37 cities arduous plague exchanges are accumulating impressive data that they are an utile tool against go around of an epidemic now in its thirteenth year.

2. Outline the argument expounds and conclusions.

set forth:?55% of use needles show traces of acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus.

?In New Haven, new human immunodeficiency virus infections are down 33% for addicts in exchanges.

ratiocination:? harass exchanges have sanctionn their benefit.

3. let out whether the exposit choke off the conclusions.

?Yes4. mark whether the expound are reasonable.

?Yes5. develop how you came to decisions about article arguments.

?both premises give impressive data to back up the argument that needle exchanges are an effective tool against the spread of an epidemic (Aids). The premises bridge over the conclusion that needle exchanges prove their benefit.

Argument 2:?Needle exchange is a thoroughly based counterattack against an epidemic.

2. Outline the argument premises and conclusions.

set forth:?Evidence shows drug users will seek out sluttish needles to cut chances of almost certain death from AIDS.

?(Some 28% of AIDS cases are IV drug users.) And AIDS treatment be taxpayers uttermost more than the price of a few needles.

Conclusion:?They should be encouraged and expanded.

3. Identify whether the premises support the conclusions.

?Yes4. Identify whether the premises are reasonable.

?Yes5. Explain how you came to decisions about article arguments.

though the first gear premise seems to be more of an opinion because thither is not any specific evidence provided, the second premise gives situations to prove that 28% of aids victims are IV drug users who logically could spread the disease further by overlap needles. Both premises logically lead to the conclusion that the needle exchange should be encouraged because it is cheaper than the cost of Aids treatment.

Article 2: PROGRAMS DON?T MAKE SENSE1. Identify at least two arguments.

Argument 1:?It?s equipment casualty to attempt to ease one crisis by reinforcing another.

2. Outline the argument premises and conclusions.

Premises:?Inconclusive data on data-based needle-distribution programs is no excuse to weaken federal substance- profane laws.

?In a Hartford, Conn., needle-distribution program, for example, drug addicts are removeing taxpayer-funded needles at four times the evaluate rate.

Conclusion:?Inconsistency and incompetence will undermine the usual?s confidence in government health-care initiatives regarding drug abuse and the AIDS epidemic.

3. Identify whether the premises support the conclusions.

?Yes4. Identify whether the premises are reasonable.

?Yes5. Explain how you came to decisions about article arguments.

?It is true that the first premise is more of an opinion, but it is backed up the facts in the opinion in premise number two. Both premises show how the public?s confidence pile be undermined in government health-care initiatives from the experimental needle-distribution causing drug addicts to demand taxpayer-funded needles at four times the expected rate.

Argument 2:?It?s wrong to tolerate a contradictory insurance that spends people?s hard-earned money to facilitate deviant behavior.

Premises:?No government bureaucrat can refute the fact that fresh, free needles make it easier to inject illegal drugs because their use results in less pain and scarring.

?Underwriting dangerous, criminal behavior is illogical: If you subsidise something, you?ll get more of it.

Conclusion:?The Clinton administration proposal of freehand away needles hurts far more people than [it is] intended to help.

3. Identify whether the premises support the conclusions.

?Yes4. Identify whether the premises are reasonable.

?Yes5. Explain how you came to decisions about article arguments.

?The first premise shows how free needles can lead to deviant behavior and the second explains how financial support of addicts can cause more abuse. Both premises support the fact that the Clinton administration proposal of giving away needles hurts far more people than [it is] intended to help.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper