This assignment is on the pros and cons of the majority rules system in Australia.

legal age Rules Verdict

A. Outline the minds that start lead to this law being changed.

The bulk Rules Verdict is in effect in a smattering of states in Australia. The main reasons for changing the standard laws for jury Verdicts to Majority Rules, is that it is very expensive to keep 12 jurors penned up in a hotel for a few age to even weeks, wholly because ace person refuses to agree with the stick. Another important reason is that the Majority Rules Verdict is less time consuming and result allow for more cases to be heard. Also it is important that the jurors contribute get back to their normal lives, instead of days penned up in a hotel about a case.

B.Discuss the effects (both constructive and negative) this law change will have on the community

POSITIVE

- superstar reason is to minimise the number of juries that hang. If your jury hangs, you feel you have wasted the courts time; wasted money and more signifi give noticetly wasted your own time.

- Cases involving hung juries dont have to take many days to resolve the problems. Thus, cases can be heard and a finding of fact can be a lot quicker if bulk rules verdict is used.

- Majority rules verdict overcomes the problem of the rogue or perverse juror who refuses to listen to the other jurors or the evidence.

NEGATIVE

-In idealistic circumstances, someone may be wrongly sentenced because of the majority rules verdict. Where the one person against the jury could have actually convinced the rest of the jury.

-It upholds the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt. Allowing a juror to dissent from a verdict of guilty means that at least one juror had a reasonable doubt, which can create uncertainty in the conviction.

C. Write a letter...

If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper