12 Angry Men and Factors of Communication

appellation 1\nIdentify the (dys)functional properties of the throng in the film as they pertain to the problem the root is working on.\n\nResponse\n1.1 Roles\nA role is a format of expected behaviour patterns attri preciselyed to psyche occupying a given role in a fond unit. The roles in the jury were non clearly defined and umpteen roles developed informally. The only verbalise role was that of the fore domain, who could be say to be a noun phrase leader in that he suggested how the stem would sit and that there should be a voting from time to time. However, he did piddling to lead the root word research whether the boy was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The foreman likewise became a note taker and sometimes a mediator. At unmatchable point he became self-conscious with this role and tried to slip away the responsibility elsewhere notwithstanding the group rejected it. venire members moved between roles of knowledge givers and information seekers.\nOther e xamples of denary roles include: the baseball caramel brown was a critic but became a follower; the critical guy with glasses (John Fielder) was curious and a compromiser through to the highest degree of the film; the immigrant was an information liquidator and also reminded the group of the earnestness and significance of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the painter was a harmoniser and the bigot remained a critic. There was wonder of roles, as demonstrated when the interior designer took on the role of hatchet man by grabbing a contribution of paper that was used to pushover tic-tac-toe by deuce people. As the discussion evolved, the group realized that an agreement on the verdict of the case has puzzle much difficult than anticipated.\n\n1.2 Norms\nNorms argon acceptable standards of behaviour deep down a group that ar shared by the groups members. In the beginning it was acceptable for group members to harass and denigrate the interior designer for his vote and questioning. The anger and unfeelingness of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time...